Michelangelo’s Last Judgment
Hall, Marcia, After Raphael: Michelangelo’s Last Judgment,
pp132-136
The painting Of Michelangelo’s last judgment
reinforced the message that Rome was on the rise again. The painting is one
huge scene on one massive wall of the Sistine chapel. The giant fresco took Michelangelo
five years to finish.
The content behind the painting was a depiction of
the second coming of Christ, the resurrection. Michelangelo’s challenges in the
painting included: how he was going to depict the heavens, how he was going to
make the angels look different form the humans, how to make the demons look
evil without making them look to imaginative.
In the fresco
Michelangelo placed Christ in the center of the action like most renaissance
art. Placed in the large composition are the dead in the lower left hand corner
and hell in the lower right. The figures on Christ’s right are rising to join
the saved and the figures on the other side are entering hell. Michelangelo made
Christ look like earlier depictions of Christ to show a newly resurrected Christ.
Christ looks to the figures in damnation as if commanding them to go to where
they belong. All of the figures are extremely spiritual showing ideal strength.
Michelangelo depicts the figures with new idealized and perfect bodies. If they
had previously been mutilated deformed or destroyed they are now beautiful and
perfect. It is possible but not certain that Michelangelo painted himself in
the figure of Bartholomew to show that the old withered boy he has now would
not be his last. That he will someday be re-gifted with an idealized body different
than that of his earthly body.
The figures seem to be leaning in and surrounding Christ
showing more engagement that other paintings of the last judgment. In surrounding
god it shows the figures choice in following god or sin. They all have a
choice.
Michelangelo made a huge shift from traditions in
this painting by depicting the angels without wings and making them look more
human like. The bodies must all be nude according to Michelangelo, to shed distinction
and to discard placement in society. The figures originally had no clothing or
drapery.
Hall,
Marcia, After Raphael: Reception of the Last Judgment pp189-193
Michelangelo’s
last judgment had many objections because of the nudity depicted in the fresco.
Pope Paul considered having the fresco destroyed. Changes were made by Daniel da
Volterra. He added loincloths to the offending parts of the figures during the
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The clothing was never removed because
they were thought to hold an important place in history.
The images
were thought to have violated the second commandment,”you shall not make for
yourself any graven image.”
Gilio had written harsh things about Michelangelo’s
painting. How nothing was right, from the image of Christ to the sequence of
events in the painting. He thought Michelangelo’s figures were showing too much
contrapposto and strain. He believed the figures should be show with the right
amount as in normal life, not an exaggerated twist. Gilio’s writings seemed to
be a warning to all painters about what was to be expected in future paintings.
Gilio was looking for a painter that didn’t exaggerate form, a humble painter
that didn't have a big ego.
Good (tho impersonal) response. Would not the 2nd commandment you quoe apply to ALL paintings and sculptures, not just this fresco by Mich? Of course, and so whose policy was it to follow that commandment? Certainly not the church of Rome, right? Like to see your response to Leo Steinberg's interpretation.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Shae.
ReplyDelete