SSTEIN--- Sir Anthony Blunt. Artistic Theory in Italy 1450-1600
Leonardo,
23-38 and Michelangelo, 58-81
MICHELANGELO
Michelangelo’s artistic theories can be broken into three different periods
in the first period; Michelangelo follows a view on arts that is influenced greatly
by high renaissance humanism. Like Leonardo he was influenced by the scientific
tradition of scientific tradition of Florentine art. However, Michelangelo was focused
more on beauty than science and truth. Michelangelo's work shows heroic quality
and emphasizes beauty of the human body. He did not believe in exact imitation
of nature. He beloved in the beauty of nature and he put emphasis on it in his
works. Michelangelo would paint his Venus by using a mixture of beautiful
features on women to create the perfect woman. He wanted to capture the male
gaze.
With the split of the
church and weakening of the pope, a change in outlook affected Michelangelo's
works. In his painting, the last judgment he didn’t make the nude beautiful
like he once had. Instead the bodies were lumpy, heavy, and ungraceful. He wasn’t
looking for beauty, more of a spiritual meaning. He is conveying that physical beauty
will pass. Love is spiritual. But love is triggered most easily through beauty
and what we see. He was becoming spiritually
minded in has age and beauty was becoming less of the physical world and more
of the spiritual world. His work was more toward the inward mental image and
still less of the naturally world.
Michelangelo created
many sculptures. He said that he created these sculptures not only with his
ideas but the as a subtractive process the form was already within the stone he
was carving. As he carved at the stone his ideas would be revealed and
uncovered trough his skills. In his statues he relied on his own imagination
and inspiration rather than following standards of beauty laid forth by past
artists.
In the last stages of
his life, Michelangelo was extremely representative. He began to give up
classical subjects and religious subjects. Instead he showed tragedy with nothing
supernatural. He was working more towards spirituality and Christianity.
LEONARDO
Leonardo dominated the philosophical field of art. He was all about studding
science and natural phenomenons of the world. He also studied mathematics to
improve observation and experimentation. This is a bit different than that of Michelangelo
because Leonardo loved nature and wanted to decipher everything that he could
about it. He recorded what he actually saw in the anatomy of life form Plants
animals and Humans. His strengths lie in the observation of natural phenomenon. His painting
was a scientific study of perspective and nature. They are based on true
principles of live from his own observations. He follows three facts when he
paints: the eye is the sense that can least easily be derived, the painter does
not rely on just his eye but measurements, and painting is based on the study
of geometry. He describes that way he works as defining the world in the most
perfect way he can. He says that people who ignore science will not be able to
produce a good work of art.
Leonardo uses light
has one of his strongest ways to represent the real world. Without the study of
light and shadow a painting will not appear believable or real. It needs to
have relief to create dimension. He studied the colors they were made when a
shadow was cast upon a certain object. He studied something much further that perspective,
he studied atmospheric perspective, or how object become less focused from a
distance. His paintings were mainly focused on this exact imitation of nature
unlike Michelangelo. He stays away from improving the nature because it will only
lead to the depiction of an unnatural world. As for anatomy he observes that
all men can be well proportioned. The proportions are usually fixed to an ideal
mans height. But he still urges people to realize that the men will vary in
looks as most all people do.
As an inventor he encouraged new ideas, but did not believe in the creation
of something that excels nature. All inventions must be plausible and real in
nature itself. Leonardo is the perfect mix of scientific observer and
imaginative creator to the point where his ideas are plausible and not too
farfetched to be made realistic.
I find that both painters offered future artists a solid instruction in how to paint a picture through divine inspiration and nature's beauty to exactness in proportions, gestures and expressions.
ReplyDelete